Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change: glusterfs dropping 32-bit arches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14. 08. 19 8:55, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
It depends on package maintainer. If upstream dropped 32-bit support, I'd stop building it for that arch in Fedora.

Why would package maintainer have to bear the burden of potential breakage if upstream doesn't test it?

If neither of my upstreams officially supports s390x, should I just drop it everywhere?

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux