Re: RANT: compton-ng…

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 13:51 +0000, Artem Tim wrote:
> Because no one reviewing packages in Fedora. Only one person
> reviewing and help witch packaging - eclipseo. Many thanks to him.

I see plenty of names in Bugzilla doing package reviews. If you’ve
waited a long time, this list is one place to ask for them (review
swaps for extra points).

> Also no one want to wait for month+ and pinging non existent
> maintainer.

Have you even attempted getting in touch with the original author? Have
you attempted proposing switching the upstream of the existing package?

Lots of things to do beforehand, but I can’t see any communication to
have happened.

> Keep more like that and more people will continue switch to SUSE,
> Arch, whatever where no such bureaucracy and where no terrible
> tooling from 1990s like RHBZ for reviewing process.

No need to get defensive about this. Provide feedback ahead of time
and, preferably, help out. Replacing tooling is not just flipping a
switch.

-- 
Ernestas Kulik
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems (Core
Services/ABRT)
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux