On 11. 08. 19 0:34, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote:
Obviously, we can prevent this by only orphaning packages with NEW bugz,
but that doesn't really solve anything, because lot of the retired
packages were actually ASSIGNED/POST/MODIFIED (for months).
Of course they were, to prevent you from retiring them even sooner.
If the only reason to set the status to ASSIGNED/POST/MODIFIED is to prevent
**me** from retiring the package, something is fundamentally broken.
If somebody has a legitimate reason to have a FTBFS package not retired, they
can ask for some kind of exception from Releng, not provide inaccurate information.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
