On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 12:07 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In the extended version: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-08-05.txt > I see that javapackages-tools is still on the list (because it depends on gradle) > and that in turn brings problems for lot of other packages. > > So I wonder what the plan forward is. I've been looking at my own packages > which depend on javapackages-tools and they really only need 2 things: >From my side as owner of javapackages-tools the plan is to do nothing as there is no problem with javapackages-tools packages (that I know of). If at some point of time javapackages-tools becomes FTBFS or FTI due to gradle or another of its dependencies being retired, I will fix the problem in an adequate way. > > 1) javapackages-filesystem > 2) %jpackage_script macro (and it deps) > > Looking at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java this is pretty much > the minimum set of what packages need to follow the guidelines. It seems that > javapackages-tools contains way more then this and I'm wondering if it would > be a good idea to do a javapackages-tools-minimal as a separate package and > move the 2 items from above there. Then over time we can move java-packages > in the base package set to use javapackages-tools-minimal and eventually drop > the full javapackages-tools from the base package set. I don't see any reason to add javapackages-tools-minimal or migrate any packages. If there are any issues with javapackages-tools then please open bugs and I will respond to them. -- Mikolaj Izdebski _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
