Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "FW" == Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

FW> At one point, there was a verified hash chain from the https://
FW> metalink service, to the repository metadata, down to individual
FW> packages.  Any tampering was detected then.

I understand that the metalink contains enough information to verify the
returnes repomd.xml files, but I guess I don't really know if there's
enough data to chase that down to the checksum of every file that's ever
expected to be on a mirror.  If it is, then great, though signatures
still have value because there are other ways to get RPMs than letting
dnf hit the mirror network.

 - J<
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux