Re: Rolling out Phase I of rawhide package gating

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/31/19 8:07 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 10:22:36AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 10:16, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:11:34AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>>> In this case it's koji.
>>>>
>>>> For every package in the mass rebuild (f31-pending tag) robosign asks
>>>> koji "hey, is foobar-1.0.1-1.fc31 signed' ? koji checks... "yes, it is".
>>>> robosign: "great, then I ask you to write out the signed rpms now"
>>>> koji: "ok, writing them out to disk again"
>>>>
>>>> it's mostly this last step thats slow. I am not sure if koji is just
>>>> seeing if they were written out and returning, or actually re-writing
>>>> them out. It seems like it might be the latter, which makes me suspect
>>>> koji could optimize this somewhat.
>>>
>>> It's still taking a long time today to get builds through Koji and
>>> into Rawhide.  Is there a reason we need to sign builds in Rawhide?

Can you define 'a long time'?

Do you have an example build for me to look at?

>> 1. Because everyone's rawhide.repo says they are signed
>> 2. Everytime we get unsigned packages people start freaking out that some
>> nation state is trying to take over their computer.
>> 3. Because nation states do that and those packages will become F32/F33 at
>> some point.
> 
> Actually my question was wrong.  Is there any reason we need to sign
> builds while they are internal to Koji (ie. proving BuildRequires for
> subsequent builds)?  They could still be signed when they go out to
> Rawhide.

Packages are signed before CI runs on them. This is so the _exact_ thing
we are going to be using/shipping/building against is the thing that we
actually test. When you instead test something, then change it, you
leave yourself open to issues with whatever changes you are doing.

CI runs before they land in the buildroot as we want to not build
against anything that was gated for whatever reason.

kevin



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux