On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 20:03 -0500, Eric Warnke wrote: > >Just a quick question. Was there a reason why the ipw2200 drivers > >weren't updated to 1.0.1, instead of 1.0.0? > Probably becuase the odd ending number represnets a development driver, > not stable. 1.0.2 will be the next stable release. Ah, that's good answer. All these different version numbering schemes can get confusing (and I just assumed it was a little like gnome or the kernel). Rodd
