søn, 06.03.2005 kl. 20.09 skrev Jeff Spaleta: > On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 19:57:53 +0100, Kyrre Ness Sjobak > <kyrre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Maybe not more than five or so. But *some*. > > Does upstream oo.org builds include any templates? How about you work > upstream and get 5 GOOD templates for oo.org into the upstream > defaults for oo.org that would be available in all oo.org builds for > all of oo.org's supported operating systems. Focusing this effort > inside fedora absolutely makes little sense to me. Whatever arguments > you make for the expectation of fedora users.. holds just as well for > oo.org users on every operating system oo.org supports. > Get five good templates into the oo.org upstream defaults.. and those > will naturally be obvious candidates for inclusion in fedora.. and > every other distros as well as oo.org on windows. > > OO.org's real strength is being available cross-platform... and i > think default templates should be implemented in a way that are > consistently available cross-platform. This will be accomplished if > people work with oo.org upstream.. this will not be accomplished if > people focus solely on getting templates into fedora. > > -jef Good idea, even if i do think it shouldn't be necessary to start with upstream - do it in fedora, se that it works well. Show upstream "hey this works well!". BTW do you (or generally users of this list) have any opinions on which one should be submitted - i ask of the same reason i ask for templates - my design judging skills are terrible. Kyrre Sjøbæk
