Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: x86-64 micro-architecture update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 06:01 +1000, David Airlie wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 5:58 AM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:45 PM Solomon Peachy <pizza@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > But since anectdote != data, are there any sort of deployment numbers
> > > out there that show how many Fedora deployments are on AVX[2]-capable
> > > hardware?
> > > 
> > There are no stats available that could be considered defensible. At
> > best, we could come up with some estimates based on the stats from
> > other sources that we might assume have a similar profile as Fedora.
> > I'm not sure if that data exists anywhere, though.
> > 
> > My main personal machine also lacks AVX2-capable hardware, so from a
> > personal perspective, I'm not super keen on this change. I'm
> > privileged enough to be able to upgrade my hardware if required, but I
> > recognize that it's not a reasonable request for others.
> > 
> > > > Fedora will use current CPUs more efficiently, increasing performance
> > > > and reducing power consumption.
> > > 
> > > I think we need to see some actual benchmarks demonstrating this.  For
> > > the core kernel and system libraries rather than microbenchmarks or
> > > specific applications that already sport AVX[2] codepaths.
> > > 
> > I agree. It would be good to see some more specifics about what the
> > benefit will be. That's the only way we can decide if it's worth the
> > cost.
> 
> I think we don't need to bother, there is way too much hardware still
> being sold by CPU vendors that don't meet this baseline.

+1. As I wrote on the talk page for this Change I see it as a complete
non-starter. I don't think we need detailed data to just say that a
change which means Fedora won't work on all CPUs made prior to 2013
(and apparently quite a lot made since then) is a complete non-starter.

Dropping i686 is a Change I can get behind, but this one is being
proposed about a decade too early.

(For anyone collecting anecdata, though: of the 5 PCs running Fedora in
this room, I think only one would be AVX2-capable).
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux