Re: Discussion around app retirements and categorizations by the CPE team

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/22/19 1:22 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 16. 07. 19 20:18, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> Good Morning,
>>
>> We posted this [1] blog today and want to open a mailing thread to garner
>> feedback, field questions and get some thoughts from the Community on
>> the approach that we in Community Platform Engineering (CPE) are taking.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/application-service-categories-and-community-handoff/
>>
> 
> What happens to Pagure? Specifically the dist-git over Pagure part?
> 
> If it stays, the front page of a package st src.fp.o might get more love
> and replace apps.fp.o, the Issues tab could be a page that replaaces
> bugz.fp.o, etc.
> 
> That said, I'm afraid Pagure might get replaced as well, correct?

Anything is possible. Personally, I think the customization we have with
pagure over dist git makes it a better frontend for our packages that
any other solutions out there, but I am just one voice. ;)

> Anyway, I respect your decisions and I understand that maintaining
> everything was not sustainable. However I guess that if we replace
> Pagure with e.g. GitLab and all our customization is gone, 

Yeah, that would be a fair pile of work to get things into a shape we
can find usable I think. It's definitely not something that will happen
overnight.

if the Wiki
> explodes and nobody will ever fix it, 

The wiki is fully supported, at least as long as QA uses it for their
TCMS. :)


if mailman3 goes away and is
> replaced by some contracted solution, 

...which could be mailman3, just run by people who do that full time...

> and when Badges die, it will be a

Hopefully we can get enough interest to move badges to a more community
supported application.

> sad day for the Fedora contributor community, possibly making
> contributing to Fedora even harder than it become over the past few years.
> 
> Personally, I wish we had spent less engineering time in infrastructure
> on Modularity and more on the contributor UX :(
> 
> I hope this transition will go as smoothly as possible. Good luck guys!
> 
> (And please keep in mind that even if I criticize some things a lot, I
> still consider you Fedora superheros.)

Thanks. None of this is easy for us, I assure you.

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux