Re: Vim and spec template

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "ZD" == Zdenek Dohnal <zdohnal@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

ZD> Converted to spaces now.

Well I appreciate that, but my point is that it's really personal
preference.

ZD> It is designed for user to run rpmdev-bumpspec
ZD> <package>.spec, so the tool will supply correct format of changelog
ZD> entry and increment the release.

That seems to be rather abstruse.  I mean, by default vim can already
add a proper changelog entry directly (assuming you're not doing
anything "interesting" with Version: and Release:).  It doesn't seem
logical to present an invalid specfile by default and then force someone
to run an external tool to make it valid.  If an external step is always
required, wouldn't it make more sense to have that step be the initial
copying of the user's preferred template into place?

 - J<
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux