Re: Heads up: No more snap plugin in gnome-software

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 14:52, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> My understanding of the situation was that Canonical is working on a
> separate experience tailored for Ubuntu because they have extra needs,
> but all of it was built on GNOME Software in the first place.

No, it's also a new codebase: https://github.com/ubuntu/snap-store --
it's confusing as the name "Snap Store" is also the name of the
debadged-gnome-software version too.

> My opinion on this is that because we don't ship the plugin or snapd
> by default on any variant of Fedora, we don't really run counter to
> the rules.

So in the same way, we could have a checkbox for "Flathub support" in
the gnome-software addons page? I don't think that would wash with
legal as we would be "facilitating" access to patent encumbered
software. I don't think the "by default" arguments protects us like
that.

> Would it make sense for Zygmunt and Maciek (CC'd to this email) to be
> added as CC contacts on Bugzilla, so they can address snap plugin
> issues when they arise?

No, as they're not the ones committing fixes to gnome-software.
Watching a bugzilla ticket doesn't equate to being responsible for
bugs. The snap plugin self tests are failing in CI, and we can't even
update to a newer gnome-software in rawhide as the version of
snapd-glib is too old. Usually when that happens either me or Kalev
have to hunt down the new tarballs, add any new BRs, scratch build,
build, submit as an update etc and that's just not fair.

> I'm just generally confused about this, and somewhat blindsided...

I was informed of the Canonical decision a few weeks ago, and it too
took me by surprise. I guess winning the war comes at a cost, and this
camel has a broken back.

> I wish someone had looped *me* into these conversations, as one of the
> snap support maintainers in Fedora, I'm relying on these things to
> provide a good experience for Fedora users of snaps...

I was asked not to distribute details about the conversations until
they had made a public statement, which still hasn't been done. I'm
not comfortable with the situation at all either but we have to do
something.

Richard.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux