Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mo, 22.04.19 08:35, Robert Marcano (robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> > What's the story anyway for rngd? Why would userspace be better at
> > providing entropy to the kernel than the kernel itself? Why do we
> > enable it on desktops at all, such systems should not be
> > entropy-starved.
>
> Non developers, true. Developer's workstations, wrong. Just signing a few
> packages (java's jarsigner) to test your code runs fine under those
> conditions can drop to near zero the entropy, taking a lot of time to finish
> the signing.

Well, "jarsigner" is broken then. It appears to use /dev/random
instead of /dev/urandom. if you use the latter, then you can pull out
as much randomness as you want, it's not affected by "entropy
depletion".

See man page about that:

http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man4/urandom.4.html

Lennart

--
Lennart Poettering, Berlin
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux