On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 4:04 PM Jonathan Dieter <jdieter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So, the background is that I'd like to build zchunk for EPEL 6 (it's > already built for EPEL 7). Unfortunately, the gcc in EL6 is too old to > build zchunk, so I'd prefer to use a newer version from an SCL, rather > than rewrite zchunk to be compatible with an ancient version of gcc. > > I noticed that SCLs are available for EPEL 7 (note the final repository > in the list at https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=259), > but not for EPEL 6 (see > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=140). The SCL's have their uses, but for EPEL? I think they'd add unnecessary complexity on an an unreliable developer codebase and be a really bad idea to rely on for EPEL componenents. RHEL 6 is at release 6.10, and should be treated as end-of-life. If the component were being embedded into the SCL, then it might make some sense to support. But as best I can tell zchunk has nothing to do with the SCL except for the gcc requirement. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
