Re: Can we use SCLs for building for EPEL 6?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> For reference, you can find zck.h.in (which gets processed into zck.h
> with the version added) at:
> https://github.com/zchunk/zchunk/blob/master/include/zck.h.in
> 
> and zck_private.h at:
> https://github.com/zchunk/zchunk/blob/master/src/lib/zck_private.h
> 
> As far as I can see, gcc-4.7 doesn't like that I'm typedefing the same
> struct to the same type twice.  Later versions don't see it as a
> problem at all.
> 
> (Just to be clear, this still happens if I change zck_private.h to say:
> typedef struct zckCtx zckCtx;)

IMHO, zck_private.h should #include "zck.h" and only define itself whatever 
is not defined in the public header.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux