On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 7:50 AM, Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Please don't, it's just pointless renaming that invalidates all end
user
documentation and makes it harder for other programs such as
packagekit
and gnome-software that all need to adopt for the new paths.
Handling a rename is not exactly rocket science. Why would this be at
all problematic? The change is proposed for F31, not F30. That's plenty
of time. If this is the last remaining usage of "yum" in the distro
then let's get rid of it and move on. Since both locations should be
read, it should be fully backwards-compatible anyway.
Also, I've heard rumours that dnf might get renamed back to yum in the
future.
Do the dnf developers know about this rumor...?
Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
