Re: Fedora 30 Beta blocker status mail #3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:56 PM <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 1:18 PM, Adam Williamson
> <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I requested testing on desktop@ and test@ lists earlier this week; so
> > far that seems to suggest that this is failing for a lot of people on
> > a
> > lot of hardware...but it also fails the same way on F29 in most cases,
> > suggesting we shipped F29 broken as well. I don't think we've yet had
> > feedback from a system where nomodeset is actually *needed*, which
> > would be interesting.
>
> Please also consider that the target audience for Fedora Workstation is
> not going to know about nomodeset or how to modify the kernel command
> line. So unless we have some specific release criterion referencing
> nomodeset, I'm not sure why it would be a blocker.

The installation media, netinstaller and Live, on both UEFI and BIOS,
contains a boot menu with a Troubleshooting submenu, which contains a
boot entry to boot using Basic Video, and that in turn has the
nomodeset parameter already set.

-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux