On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 08:56:26AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 04. 03. 19 v 7:30 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > > Bonus question: Are "Problem 1" (etc) in each section of the error > > message supposed to relate to each other in some way? Or is the > > second list a new list of problems? > > > You mean this error: > - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module stratis:1:20181215204600:a5b0195c-0.x86_64 > - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module standard-test-roles:3.0:3020190214144451:a5b0195c-0.x86_64 > ... > > The dependency > module(platform:f30) > is virtual. There is no package which provides this. The dependency is put into an RPM transaction sack by DNF based on > PLATFORM_ID from *current* /etc/os-release Indeed. I'm not sure whether we can reasonably support this upgrade method, although suggestions welcome :| The failure in this case isn't caused by modules, however; the messages are informational. P
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
