Is dnf update --releasever=30 supposed to work with modules?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On my Fedora 29-ish machine, I just tried:

# dnf update --best --releasever=30

However it fails with pages of errors which seem to be related to
modules.  Is this supposed to work?  It certainly worked fine in
previous Fedora releases.

Bonus question: Are "Problem 1" (etc) in each section of the error
message supposed to relate to each other in some way?  Or is the
second list a new list of problems?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Free tainted          42 kB/s |  71 kB     00:01    
RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Free - Updates        43 kB/s |  71 kB     00:01    
RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Free                  43 kB/s |  71 kB     00:01    
RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Nonfree - Updates     43 kB/s |  71 kB     00:01    
RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Nonfree               43 kB/s |  71 kB     00:01    
tlp RPM packages                                206  B/s | 242  B     00:01    
tlp RPM packages                                198  B/s | 234  B     00:01    
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free-tainted', ignoring this repo.
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free-updates', ignoring this repo.
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free', ignoring this repo.
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates', ignoring this repo.
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree', ignoring this repo.
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'tlp-updates', ignoring this repo.
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'tlp', ignoring this repo.
Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:34 ago on Mon 04 Mar 2019 06:25:55 GMT.
Modular dependency problems:

 Problem 1: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module stratis:1:20181215204600:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
 Problem 2: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module standard-test-roles:3.0:3020190214144451:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
 Problem 3: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module ripgrep:latest:3020190214090003:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
 Problem 4: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module ninja:latest:3020190218225555:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
 Problem 5: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module meson:latest:3020190218225437:36245242-0.x86_64
 Problem 6: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module libgit2:0.27:3020190218225305:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
 Problem 7: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module gimp:2.10:3020190218225005:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
 Problem 8: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module fish:3:3020190219150858:602da195-0.x86_64
 Problem 9: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module exa:latest:3020190214120734:e50d0d19-0.x86_64
 Problem 10: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module dwm:6.1:3020190213215420:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
 Problem 11: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module bat:latest:3020190214090936:e50d0d19-0.x86_64
 Problem 12: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module avocado:stable:3020190213205848:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
Error: 
 Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package python2-zanata-client-1.5.2-3.fc29.noarch
  - nothing provides python2.7dist(ordereddict) needed by python2-zanata-client-1.5.2-4.fc30.noarch
 Problem 2: package dbus-common-1:1.12.12-2.fc30.noarch conflicts with fedora-release < 30-0.2 provided by fedora-release-29-7.noarch
  - package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch requires system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package dbus-common-1:1.12.10-1.fc29.noarch
  - problem with installed package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch
 Problem 3: package dbus-daemon-1:1.12.12-2.fc30.x86_64 conflicts with fedora-release < 30-0.2 provided by fedora-release-29-7.noarch
  - package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch requires system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package dbus-daemon-1:1.12.10-1.fc29.x86_64
  - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch
 Problem 4: cannot install both protobuf-lite-3.6.1-2.fc30.x86_64 and protobuf-lite-3.5.0-8.fc29.x86_64
  - package vlc-core-1:3.0.5-10.fc29.x86_64 requires libprotobuf-lite.so.15()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package protobuf-lite-3.5.0-8.fc29.x86_64
  - problem with installed package vlc-core-1:3.0.5-10.fc29.x86_64
 Problem 5: cannot install both readline-8.0-2.fc30.x86_64 and readline-7.0-12.fc29.x86_64
  - package augeas-1.11.0-2.fc30.x86_64 requires libreadline.so.7()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package readline-7.0-12.fc29.x86_64
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package augeas-1.10.1-3.fc29.x86_64
 Problem 6: package dbus-daemon-1:1.12.12-2.fc30.x86_64 conflicts with fedora-release < 30-0.2 provided by fedora-release-29-7.noarch
  - package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch requires system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package dbus-x11-1:1.12.12-2.fc30.x86_64 requires dbus-daemon = 1:1.12.12-2.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package rpmfusion-free-release-tainted-29-1.noarch requires rpmfusion-free-release = 29-1, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package dbus-x11-1:1.12.10-1.fc29.x86_64
  - problem with installed package rpmfusion-free-release-tainted-29-1.noarch
 Problem 7: problem with installed package augeas-1.10.1-3.fc29.x86_64
  - package augeas-1.11.0-2.fc30.x86_64 requires libreadline.so.7()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package augeas-1.10.1-3.fc29.x86_64 requires augeas-libs = 1.10.1-3.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both readline-8.0-2.fc30.x86_64 and readline-7.0-12.fc29.x86_64
  - cannot install both augeas-libs-1.11.0-2.fc30.x86_64 and augeas-libs-1.10.1-3.fc29.x86_64
  - package NetworkManager-1:1.16.0-0.1.fc30.x86_64 requires libreadline.so.8()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package augeas-libs-1.10.1-3.fc29.x86_64
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package NetworkManager-1:1.12.6-4.fc29.x86_64
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux