On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 18:05 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 28. 02. 19 16:55, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 07:51 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 06:46 -0800, Tom London wrote: > > > > [root@localhost ~]# sudo dnf --releasever=30 > > > > --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 --enablerepo=updates-testing > > > > distro-sync > > > > Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 536 kB/s | 2.4 MB > > > > 00:04 > > > > Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - Updates 71 B/s | 257 B > > > > 00:03 > > > > Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Test Updates 67 B/s | 257 B > > > > 00:03 > > > > Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 62 B/s | 257 B > > > > 00:04 > > > > Fedora 30 - x86_64 7.4 MB/s | 61 MB > > > > 00:08 > > > > Fedora 30 - x86_64 - VirtualBox 3.2 kB/s | 6.9 kB > > > > 00:02 > > > > Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'virtualbox' > > > > Ignoring repositories: virtualbox > > > > Error: > > > > Problem 1: package python2-blockdev-2.21-1.fc29.x86_64 requires > > > > libblockdev(x86-64) = 2.21-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be > > > > installed > > > > - libblockdev-2.21-1.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > > > > repository > > > > - problem with installed package python2-blockdev-2.21-1.fc29.x86_64 > > > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33105158 ought to fix this. > > > > More generally, the *flood* of Python 2 dep issues here is something I > > was definitely concerned about with the Python 2 retirement policy > > explicitly deciding not to say anything about obsoleting Python 2 > > subpackages :( > > I wanted the py3 packages to obsolte the py2, but i was outvoted. > > I now manually add those to fedora-obsoelte-packages, but I do it in batches. > I wait for a compose now to make another batch (fora rawhide and f30). I think where the upgrade fails because the python2 package is a subpackage and has a version-specific dependency on another subpackage from the same source package, that other subpackage should obsolete it. That's what I did for blockdev: python2-blockdev requires libblockdev of the same version, so to me it makes sense for libblockdev to obsolete python2-blockdev in builds where python2-blockdev is not built: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libblockdev/c/46c87cc14b2e4783555221d49fbdff7138fb6c0f?branch=master do you see any issues with that? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
