On 26. 02. 19 15:08, Petr Šabata wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:41:56PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019, 14:24 Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680320#c2
When you try to run:
mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 shell
You will get:
Problem 1: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
stratis:1:20181215204600:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
Problem 2: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
standard-test-roles:3.0:3020190214144451:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
....
rawhide has module_id=platform:f31.
When will be all rawhide modules rebuild? Or what is the solution for
this? Because right now all rawhide modules are
basically broken. And because Mock started using modular fedora repos,
then all Mock attempts for rawhides builds are
broken too.
Related: It would be nice if module repositories in mock (and COPR) were an
optional thing (right now, probably default=off, until that stuff is
fixed), like bootstrap chroot and network access.
I know, "just add another option" ... still, I'll manually disable all
modular repos in mock configs on my local system, but that's not an option
for COPR.
I always wonder why people disable the repo -- it's part of
Fedora. What's your motivation?
Do we have modular repositories in Koji?
If not, why do we have them in mock, that is certainly not OK.
If yes, why are we dealing with ursa major and/or alternatives?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
