On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:41:56PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019, 14:24 Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680320#c2 > > > > When you try to run: > > mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 shell > > > > You will get: > > Problem 1: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module > > stratis:1:20181215204600:a5b0195c-0.x86_64 > > Problem 2: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module > > standard-test-roles:3.0:3020190214144451:a5b0195c-0.x86_64 > > .... > > > > rawhide has module_id=platform:f31. > > > > When will be all rawhide modules rebuild? Or what is the solution for > > this? Because right now all rawhide modules are > > basically broken. And because Mock started using modular fedora repos, > > then all Mock attempts for rawhides builds are > > broken too. > > > > Related: It would be nice if module repositories in mock (and COPR) were an > optional thing (right now, probably default=off, until that stuff is > fixed), like bootstrap chroot and network access. > > I know, "just add another option" ... still, I'll manually disable all > modular repos in mock configs on my local system, but that's not an option > for COPR. I always wonder why people disable the repo -- it's part of Fedora. What's your motivation? P
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
