On 13/02/19 14:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Isn't the assembler syntax different or does gas now support > the nasm syntax (and macros plus a bunch of other stuff AIUI)? > If we require gas then I assume a whole bunch of asm would have > to be rewritten ... Indeed, for example edk2 used to have separate source files for masm and gas (yuck) and has standardized on nasm a few years ago. If binutils can support nasm syntax, I'd be happy to use it of course. Paolo _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
