On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:30:43AM +0000, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > > I can maintain nasm if no one else wants to take it. > > Please do, if that it what you want. However I think that it > might be better in the long run if we can retire nasm (and yasm > too) and instead replace them with gas. Isn't the assembler syntax different or does gas now support the nasm syntax (and macros plus a bunch of other stuff AIUI)? If we require gas then I assume a whole bunch of asm would have to be rewritten ... Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
