Re: Fixing Wireguard spec file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/4/19 6:38 PM, Dominique Martinet wrote:
It's the second time I read wireguard would be coming in the 5.0 kernel
here - what makes you folk say that?
I certainly haven't seen anything to that extent lately and 5.0 is petty
well under way, something as big a zinc likely won't make the cut this
late.

The people that are working on WireGuard think things should be stable by this summer (June) so it most likely won't make 5.0 but something a bit after. My point is, I rather spend my efforts stabilizing the DKMS packages that have worked for years now, rather than change things totally over to using an akmod based approach. Especially with the possibility of having WireGuard upstream sometime this year.

(as for akmods, it's packaged as such as well in rpmfusion, and that
just works afaict)

Indeed. If those fit peoples needs, I urge them to use them.

Joe





--
Joe Doss
joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux