Re: Listing maintainers vs packages vs dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Well that's news to me! This is not hosted under fp.org so I'm a bit surprised.
>
> It's not, we just hacked this when he started monitoring the Python 3 porting
> progress. It's created by Fedora Python SIG without the involvement of Fedora Infra.

Ack.

> The important bit is to check for both rawhide and rawhide-source.
> This should get you a complete set. Except modularity, but that's another story.

Noted!

> You don't really need a side tag when removing stuff. Just do it incrementally,
> maybe with fedpkg chain-build. Let me know if you want more information or me to
> do it. We can meet on IRC, but not until next week.

I can look this up now that I have a starting point. If not bothering
with a side tag is fine, then I won't. I simply wanted to avoid
breaking dependencies if I can help it, but as a set of 6 packages
it's mostly contained.

> Nosetest is used by 171 Python 2 packages :(

Well, I can only sympathize with other maintainers being too busy to
make the transition right away. Once I'm done it will be at most 165
remaining packages :)

Dridi
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux