On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 05:01:45PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote: > Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >>>>>> "RH" == Robbie Harwood <rharwood@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > RH> If I backport this to fc29, will that assuage people's concerns? > > > > I think it would certainly help and I wouldn't complain. In fact, I'd > > love to start running that as soon as I can. However, it wouldn't > > help anyone who does a (supposedly supported) F28->F30 update. I do > > not know if that is a significant concern. > > Nothing would break, so it's technically correct to leave out right now > I think. Since my f28 builds match f29 right now, I just did both: > > fc28: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0956d60ffd > fc29: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d226c3ecf1 > > I've also updated the change page to mention that these warnings are > present (and the versions they start appearing in). So that gives 4+ months of warnings (assuming the F28 and F29 updates go to stable soon), which should be enough for people to take notice. It seems it's fine to remove in F30 as originally planned. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
