On Sat, 2019-01-12 at 11:18 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 10:23 AM J. Scheurich <mufti11@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > LMGTFY (fedora review swap ) > > > > > > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/5OPPTTNKQF2S5PUOX4HNAW5B7R4UFREU/ > > > > > > > > > > This review ends with > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557546 > > > > > Fedora Update System 2010-03-23 23:30:09 UTC > > > telepathy-sunshine-0.1.6-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 > > > > stable repository. If problems still > > > persist, please make note of it in this bug report. > > > > Are there any other review requests which can return sponsorship ? > > I assume Sérgio posted that link as an example of how a request for > review swaps would look like, and not as a concrete bug for you to > look at. To summarize: Asking for a review swap is usually done as a > post to this very "devel" mailing list, and it includes the package > name, bugzilla link, and which kinds of packages you can review in > return. Exactly > > Googling "fedora review swap sponsor" shows nothing interesting 8-( > > Probably because "review swap" and "sponsorship" are two entirely > different and only slightly related things, but both of them need to > happen, before you can submit this package to fedora. > > In short: > - Since this is your first package, you as a *packager* have to be > sponsored by a "proven packager". This usually involves doing some > non-binding, informal reviews of pending packages to show that you > understand the Packaging Guidelines and process. > - Every submitted package (not only your first one) has to be > reviewed > by someone who already is a packager for fedora. This is to ensure > package correctness and quality, and legal conformity (licensing > appropriate, no patents involved). This can be done via "review > swaps", where two packagers review each other's package submissions > to > speed up the process. > > So, it's not your wdune package that needs to be sponsored, but you > as > a packager. yes , you need convince someone to sponsor you [1] [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Convincing_someone_to_sponsor_you Best regards, > Also - according to > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153 - there have been > some comments on your package review, but it's still unassigned and > has not been formally approved. You'll need somebody to step as > "official" reviewer and to set the "fedora-review" flag > appropriately. > > I hope this clears things up for you. > > Fabio > > > so long > > MUFTI > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > > List Guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
