On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 10:23 AM J. Scheurich <mufti11@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > LMGTFY (fedora review swap ) > > > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/5OPPTTNKQF2S5PUOX4HNAW5B7R4UFREU/ > > > > > > This review ends with > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557546 > > | Fedora Update System 2010-03-23 23:30:09 UTC > > | telepathy-sunshine-0.1.6-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 > stable repository. If problems still > | persist, please make note of it in this bug report. > > Are there any other review requests which can return sponsorship ? I assume Sérgio posted that link as an example of how a request for review swaps would look like, and not as a concrete bug for you to look at. To summarize: Asking for a review swap is usually done as a post to this very "devel" mailing list, and it includes the package name, bugzilla link, and which kinds of packages you can review in return. > Googling "fedora review swap sponsor" shows nothing interesting 8-( Probably because "review swap" and "sponsorship" are two entirely different and only slightly related things, but both of them need to happen, before you can submit this package to fedora. In short: - Since this is your first package, you as a *packager* have to be sponsored by a "proven packager". This usually involves doing some non-binding, informal reviews of pending packages to show that you understand the Packaging Guidelines and process. - Every submitted package (not only your first one) has to be reviewed by someone who already is a packager for fedora. This is to ensure package correctness and quality, and legal conformity (licensing appropriate, no patents involved). This can be done via "review swaps", where two packagers review each other's package submissions to speed up the process. So, it's not your wdune package that needs to be sponsored, but you as a packager. Also - according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153 - there have been some comments on your package review, but it's still unassigned and has not been formally approved. You'll need somebody to step as "official" reviewer and to set the "fedora-review" flag appropriately. I hope this clears things up for you. Fabio > so long > MUFTI > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
