Re: dnf download misbehaving?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Should a bug report be filed, and if so where?

Marek Blaha wrote:

> Looks like the problem is with fedora updates source repository metadata.
> I've downloaded metalink from URL
> https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-source-f29&arch=x86_64
> I checked a few mirrors from the list and the content of primary metadata
> file is somewhat unsatisfying (basically it is empty):
> 
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <metadata xmlns="http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/common"; xmlns:rpm="
> http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/rpm"; packages="0">
> </metadata>
> 
> Marek
> 
> --
> Marek Blaha <mblaha@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:56 PM Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> dnf download --source wireshark
>> [...]
>> No package wireshark-2.6.5-1.fc29.src available.
>> Exiting due to strict setting.
>> Error: No package wireshark-2.6.5-1.fc29.src available.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux