Should a bug report be filed, and if so where? Marek Blaha wrote: > Looks like the problem is with fedora updates source repository metadata. > I've downloaded metalink from URL > https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-source-f29&arch=x86_64 > I checked a few mirrors from the list and the content of primary metadata > file is somewhat unsatisfying (basically it is empty): > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <metadata xmlns="http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/common" xmlns:rpm=" > http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/rpm" packages="0"> > </metadata> > > Marek > > -- > Marek Blaha <mblaha@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:56 PM Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> dnf download --source wireshark >> [...] >> No package wireshark-2.6.5-1.fc29.src available. >> Exiting due to strict setting. >> Error: No package wireshark-2.6.5-1.fc29.src available. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx