Re: dnf download misbehaving?

[Marek Blaha <mblaha@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Looks like the problem is with fedora updates source repository metadata. I've downloaded metalink from URL

https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-source-f29&arch=x86_64

I checked a few mirrors from the list and the content of primary metadata file is somewhat unsatisfying (basically it is empty):

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<metadata xmlns="http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/common" xmlns:rpm="http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/rpm" packages="0">
</metadata>

Marek

--
Marek Blaha <mblaha@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:56 PM Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

dnf download --source wireshark
[...]
No package wireshark-2.6.5-1.fc29.src available.
Exiting due to strict setting.
Error: No package wireshark-2.6.5-1.fc29.src available.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx