Re: F30: System-Wide Change proposal: DNF UUID

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lennart Poettering wrote:
> BTW, iirc intel used to count installations through the http ping
> check in their captive portal detection. Fedora runs a similar service
> which is used by NM, no? maybe that's a nicer solution too: add a http
> header field to the ping check that each client sets to "1" on one of
> these ping checks a day, and "0" all other times. Then you count how
> many non-zero ping checks you get within a 24h window and you have a
> really good idea how many users you have. All without any explicit
> tracking. And again this appears to me is a much better deal to me
> than the uuid/dnf check that has been proposed, as you can say "we
> provide you with ping check functionality therefore we count you":
> both sides get something out of it.

And this is why I have always been and am still opposed to the 
NetworkManager-config-connectivity-fedora spyware and uninstalled it (or did 
not install it in the first place on upgrades) on my computers.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux