On 12/20/18 2:35 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Thursday, 20 December 2018 at 11:29, Richard Hughes wrote: >> On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 10:16, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> So I say +100 to just pushing the changes directly, as said >>> people can always revert them. >> >> Completely agree. For my packages I'd totally prefer things just >> magically be done without any action on my part. > > Same here and I'm in ACLs for ~100 packages, too. I definitely don't > want to deal with a 100 PRs, for something so trivial. I'll revert > if necessary, no big deal. Thanks for doing this to Igor, by the way. Yes, thanks! However, some clarification: do you intend to just remove the scriptlets and thats it? Or, also bump version and add a changelog entry? or also that and do a build? I'm fine with any of those, but I guess builds could interfere with people who are in the middle of rebuilding some stacks. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
