>>>>> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> writes: ZJ> I think it's pretty clear: all the standard invocations of ZJ> scriptlets that have by replaced by transfiletriggers will be ZJ> removed, along with the whole %post/%postun sections if its the only ZJ> thing in them. I do think it would be better to list exactly what is expected to be changed (and which packages actually need which changes). ZJ> I think that the way this should be handled is that if maintainers ZJ> of a package want to use a single branch for F30+ and ZJ> EPEL/RHEL/whatever, it is on them to arrange the spec file with the ZJ> appropriate conditionals. Well, that's what makes it tough. You can remove the scriptlets, or you can replace them with the various sets of macros which do nothing on Fedora and do something on EPEL (to the extent that is even possible). The macros needed are often context-dependent. Certainly just removing things is simplest but will cause the most upset. It's not trivial to know if a maintainer insists on the single spec approach, so it can be rather difficult to do this in an automated fashion. Of course it would be easy if everyone just fixed the packages they maintain so that there's no need for automated fixup. I'd hope that some of that might happen if the lists of packages which need changes are provided. I did some of that a couple of releases ago and I could try to do it again if someone could lengthen the day by a few hours. - J< _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
