Yes, that is the plan. On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:45 PM Björn Persson <Bjorn@rombobjörn.se> wrote: > > > ** Rename gnupg package to gnupg1 > > ** Rename gpg binary to gpg1 > > ** Rename gpg2 binary to gpg > > ** Create gpg2 → gpg symlink > > Just for clarity, and in the context of the proposed source file > verification policy (https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/610): > > The gnupg2 package will keep that name, right? So if we tell packagers > to write "BuildRequires: gnupg2" in their spec files, that dependency > will remain valid forever? > > Björn Persson > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
