Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: GnuPG2 as default GPG implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> ** Rename gnupg package to gnupg1
> ** Rename gpg binary to gpg1
> ** Rename gpg2 binary to gpg
> ** Create gpg2 → gpg symlink

Just for clarity, and in the context of the proposed source file
verification policy (https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/610):

The gnupg2 package will keep that name, right? So if we tell packagers
to write "BuildRequires: gnupg2" in their spec files, that dependency
will remain valid forever?

Björn Persson

Attachment: pgpc8EZN8fqMj.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux