Re: What does delaying F31 mean for packagers/users?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Folks, hi.

Planning for a specific delay for a specific reason is one thing. But
the same design philosophy reasons that apply to Fedora 31 have
applied to almost every other Fedora releases, and changing to an
annual cycle is going to drive people *nuts* when updates for their
particular critical components get delayed up to 18 months because
they missed the *current* release and have to wait for the next major
release for the dependencies to be built up. This especially plays out
with tools that use many distinct small modules by different authors,
such as Python. Have you *looked* at what happens if python modules
are even slightly out of date, and the dependency chain that "pip
instlal" brings in?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux