Re: Package pruning for FC4 and beyond - question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Since this is the second time this has come up...

Is being part of RHEL reason enough to keep things in core? If that is the case I will exclude from my list all packages that exist in RHEL. Personally I don't think that should be the goal here.

If you want RHEL compatibility then get a RHEL knockoff.

Cheers
Eric

Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:24:18 -0500, Eric Warnke wrote:


Possible without objections
mc - Is this really a core util? would it be better served in extras?


Considering that it was re-added to RHEL 4, yes.


--

Eric Warnke                   Computer Programmer / Systems Analyst
eric@xxxxxxxxxxxx                                      518-727-1523
GPG Fingerprint: E7C5 615B 2115 C9D9 7E75  5088 930B 91E5 218B 6259

'There is always an easy solution to every human problem -- neat,
plausible, and wrong.' - H.L. Mencken

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux