Re: What does delaying F31 mean for packagers/users?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 2:58 PM Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:15:52 +0000, you wrote:
>
> >From an IoT perspective where we're looking at some features around
> >security that could be cross component dependent
> >(toolchain/kernel/userspace) to be unable to consume for possibly an
> >18 month window, yes we rebase kernels but we need to rebase other
> >components and build against those, in a stable release is a complete
> >and utter disaster.
>
> Is it specific to the F30/31 timeframe, or is it something that could
> be alleviated by instead delaying to a F31/32 delay?
>
> In other words, if the delay is necessary is there a better choice of
> time to do it that would help to minimize the disruption to the
> various Fedora communities?

At the moment I don't see that changing at all from an IoT perspective.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux