I don't have time to revert back and try updating again, but the fix looks good! Thanks! On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:19 PM Tom Gundersen <teg@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Igor, > > The upgrade path should hopefully be fixed with dbus-broker-16-8. > > Cheers, > > Tom > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:33 AM Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> So I've tried to do following update: >> Install dbus-broker-16-7.fc30.x86_64 @rawhide >> Upgrade dbus-1:1.12.10-9.fc30.x86_64 @rawhide >> Upgraded dbus-1:1.12.10-8.fc30.x86_64 @@System >> Upgrade dbus-common-1:1.12.10-9.fc30.noarch @rawhide >> Upgraded dbus-common-1:1.12.10-8.fc30.noarch @@System >> Upgrade dbus-daemon-1:1.12.10-9.fc30.x86_64 @rawhide >> Upgraded dbus-daemon-1:1.12.10-8.fc30.x86_64 @@System >> Upgrade dbus-libs-1:1.12.10-9.fc30.x86_64 @rawhide >> Upgraded dbus-libs-1:1.12.10-8.fc30.x86_64 @@System >> Upgrade dbus-tools-1:1.12.10-9.fc30.x86_64 @rawhide >> Upgraded dbus-tools-1:1.12.10-8.fc30.x86_64 @@System >> Upgrade dbus-x11-1:1.12.10-9.fc30.x86_64 @rawhide >> Upgraded dbus-x11-1:1.12.10-8.fc30.x86_64 @@System >> >> I ended up with disabled both dbus-daemon and dbus-broker. >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:19 PM Tom Gundersen <teg@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Tomasz, >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:36 AM Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczko.tomasz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 11:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 02:36:31AM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: >> >>> > After last dbus upgrade gdm found that is not able to start. >> >>> >> >>> What Fedora version? Ideally provide specific rpm versions. >> >>> dbus-in-F29 != dbus-in-F30 now. >> >> >> >> >> >> I’m talking about F30 recent change in which has been implemented switch to dubs-broker. >> > >> > >> > Thanks for the report, and sorry for the inconvenience. There was indeed a bug in the dbus-broker spec file, which we now fixed with version 16-7 (should land in rawhide any minute). >> > >> >> >> >> Ps. If this change has been propagated to F29 (hopefully not) more things will be screwed. >> > >> > >> > It has not (and will not be). >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Tom >> > _______________________________________________ >> > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
