On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 03:57:25PM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 15:19, Tom Gundersen <teg@xxxxxxx> wrote: > [..] > >>> What Fedora version? Ideally provide specific rpm versions. > >>> dbus-in-F29 != dbus-in-F30 now. > >> > >> I’m talking about F30 recent change in which has been implemented switch to dubs-broker. > > > > Thanks for the report, and sorry for the inconvenience. > > np .. when tree is chopped chops are flying around :) > > > There was indeed a bug in the dbus-broker spec file, which we now fixed with version 16-7 (should land in rawhide any minute). > > IMO it would be good to learn something out of that small fault > because few thing went really odd way. > > 1) if dbus service crashes/is not availaible temporary IMO it wold be > good to prepare whole desktop apps code to not crash but handle dbus > disconnection and maybe display centered message that it is not > possible to connect to dbus. Crashing everything looks really *bad*. > > 3) any other dependency on running dbus service should be IMO closely > investigated and if something is just crashing it should be > changed/redesigned to handle this to at least log that to system logs > (nothing like this after all was possible to find in systemd journal > or rsyslogd logs). Feel free to provide patches. There was 15 years to fix it. Alternatively, dbus-broker may store fds in systemd and serialize state over restarts. -- Tomasz Torcz "Funeral in the morning, IDE hacking xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx in the afternoon and evening." - Alan Cox _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
