On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:30:14PM +0000, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> Just to be clear on this, unlike deltarpm, zchunked rpms shouldn't
> require extra CPU usage on the client side as they don't go through the
> decompress-recompress cycle that deltarpms do. Re-assembling a zchunk
> file requires no compression or decompression.
Btw, we can easily do that for deltarpms as well. We only recompress
because we want a rpm that is bit-identical to the remote one.
Having a '-u' option that makes applydeltarpm write a rpm with an
uncompressed payload and no payload signatures is just a couple of
lines of code.
Cheers,
Michael.
--
Michael Schroeder mls@xxxxxxx
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
