> As can be clearly seen from the breadth of the update streams, once F+2 > is released, F+1 still gets a moderate number of updates, but F only > gets major bugs fixed, at best. Some maintainers care more, some less, > but it's pretty obvious that our "oldstable" release is not where the > maintainers are. Now imagine how well we would support F-4 (36 months) > or F-6 (48 months). I'd guess "not at all". > > I don't see this going anywhere without a lot of new maintainers. > > Zbyszek How about keeping the number of supported releases the same, just change the support window for them. For example have one release that is supported for 6 months, and then have one release that is supported for longer. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
