On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:36:44AM -0500, Owen Taylor wrote: > Thanks for starting this discussion, Matthew! > > A few notes: > > * My personal long-term dream is that all Fedora users are running > Silverblue, we do great automated QA testing, and upgrading from one > Fedora to the next is a non-event, and opt-out rather than opt-in, and > long term support would not be needed. We aren't there yet. :-) > * If we have a long-term support branch, the stuff that's in the > default install / the stuff that would be in a Silverblue image - > should be rebased very sparingly. I think we'd have to define this set > - it's bigger than the current "critical path". > * As we move higher up the stack, it's more reasonable for > maintainers to take an approach of maintaining a single version across > active Fedora branches - and we have various mechanism to make that > easier: packages.cfg, module stream expansion, Flatpaks. packages.cfg? I'm not sure I know what this refers to, would you have any pointers? Thanks, Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
