On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 11:56 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > > This was not approved - there was a -1 vote and so it was > > > > planned to be > > > > discussed in the next meeting. > > > > > > I commented the ticket, but I will copy my response here: there > > > was no > > > single -1 within a week after opening a ticket so to my knowledge > > > the > > > ticket was approved. > > * The ticket had formal proposal offered (means that FESCo members > can vote) > * 6 FESCo members voted +1 within a week (which means that there were > at least three "for" votes and no "against" votes) > > Considering 2 points above -- I can read that it is approved. Waiting > for anyone to put note that it is approved is nice, but not must. If > the policy is somehow different from what I have read, please update > docs.fp.o and announce it. I suppose that's a fair interpretation of the wording in the policy, though it wasn't my personal interpretation based off of memory. I think I would generally prefer that people wait for the ticket to officially say it's approved, but you are right that the policy doesn't explicitly state that. In any case, fair enough, I retract my claim that it wasn't approved ☺
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
