Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:32:14PM +0100, Adam Samalik wrote:
> Do we have any user data about what "stability" means to users and on what
> different levels that can be achieved? Is it about app versions such as
> MariaDB? is it about language runtime versions such as Node.js? is it about
> things like glibc? or kernel? Or does it need to be the whole distro as we
> have it today?
> 
> In case we don't find a uniform solution that would fit all those cases (==
> for the whole release as we know it today), focusing on those specific
> levels (modules? rings?! ;) ) might help with different approaches could
> help us at least a little bit. Well, considering there are some.

I'm thinking mostly about a base platform. And even there, I think kernel
versions and such can change -- we don't need a RHEL-style kernel ABI
promise. We just need changes there to not break 1) the hardware it runs on
and 2) the stuff on top.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux