Re: Ursa Major (modules in buildroot) enablement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 09:04 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It is not. Arguably, this check should be blocking across the board.
> I
> personally would rather have this check earlier than Bodhi (mark
> builds in Koji as failed if they aren't installable), but that
> appears
> to be a thing we can't do.

Sometimes builds depend on other builds, so this would not always be
possible. Bodhi is a good place to check things like this, because it
is the first time you have an opportunity to express "these builds ship
together".

It would be nice if there were a way to express this earlier, such as
Pagure PRs.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux