On 2018-11-04 11:21 a.m., Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le dimanche 04 novembre 2018 à 11:01 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga a écrit : >> On 2018-11-04 4:43 a.m., Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >>> So, basically you should just need a do2unix and the following lines >>> in >>> rawhide: >> I have Fedora 29 installed and the above line still led to error. > Which error please? > > $ rpmspec -P luxcorerender.spec > 'orgemeta: invalid option -- ' > in forgemeta(az:sviu:) > error: line 10: %forgemeta -a > $ dos2unix luxcorerender.spec > dos2unix: converting file luxcorerender.spec to Unix format... > $ rpmspec -P luxcorerender.spec > Name: luxcorerender > Version: 2.1 > … Yes that error. I haven't used rpmspec command before. Very useful. >> Maybe >> porting redhat-rpm-macro to the current release will alleviate the >> issue. > If you have the above error that’s due to the DOS end of lines in your > spec file. > > Otherwise, as I said, you need devel (a Fedora version with redhat-rpm- > config 123 or a later version) for forgemeta to understand multiple > archives. Noted. That resolved the problem. > >>> Name: luxcorerender >>> Version: 2.1 >>> %global prerelease beta1 >>> %global forgeurl0 https://github.com/%{name}/LuxCore >>> %global tag0 luxcorerender_v%{version}%{?prerelease} >>> >>> %global forgeurl1 https://github.com/%{name}/BlendLuxCore >>> %global tag1 blendluxcore_v%{version}%{?prerelease} >>> >>> %forgemeta -a >>> >>> […] That line generated an error using rpmbuild -bs command on Fedora 29. It looks like the tool needs upgrade as well. >>> >>> Source0: %{forgesource0} >>> Source1: %{forgesource1} >>> >>> […] >>> >>> %prep >>> %forgesetup -a >>> %patch0 -pX >> Will it be better to put "%forgesetup -a -pX" in one line similar to >> "%autosetup" considering this scenario? > Really, no. You can unpack several archives at once (with -a) or unpack > one at a time with patching (with forgeautosetup -z <number>) but rpm > macro argument parsing is not up to doing both at once safely. %setup > does not use normal rpm argument parsing, that's why it sort of works. > > And, besides, the result would probably be unmaintainable cryptic macro > calls. > > Regards, Thank you for the explanation. I submitted the spec for re-review on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645913. I'll update shortly with the newer version. Luya
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
