Hello, On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 8:37 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 8:23 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Yes, I agree, I am at a loss as to why it was signed off as well, > > there was blockers like "Be able to apply updates using the desktop > > mechanism" that were seemingly ignored with broken gnome-software, > > plus numerous other issues. I don't feel it was ready but clearly > > someone had some agenda to ram it on through despite the issues. > > Just the opposite, actually. mattdm and I were both in favor of > waiting another week to release on the 15th anniversary of the Fedora > Core 1 release. The bugs you refer to were all reviewed according to > our normal blocker review procedure. You can look in the minutes or > the log for the reasoning, but it generally came down to being unable > to reproduce them. Of course, you still have the right to say "I told > you so" if they blow up. > > I can't say for sure that nobody had an "agenda to ram it on through", > but if they did, they didn't invite me to join the conspiracy. The > discussion around the blockers and the release in general was reasoned > and informed by folks arguing on both sides, as I would expect from > the Fedora community. We can always stand to improve the process, and > I'm happy to hear suggestions you have. But conspiratorial accusations > are not constructive. Just a query, Does XFCE Fedora 29 spin is removed? It is not visible here https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/29_RC-1.2/Spins/x86_64/iso/ Thanks, Chandan Kumar _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
