On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 8:23 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, I agree, I am at a loss as to why it was signed off as well, > there was blockers like "Be able to apply updates using the desktop > mechanism" that were seemingly ignored with broken gnome-software, > plus numerous other issues. I don't feel it was ready but clearly > someone had some agenda to ram it on through despite the issues. Just the opposite, actually. mattdm and I were both in favor of waiting another week to release on the 15th anniversary of the Fedora Core 1 release. The bugs you refer to were all reviewed according to our normal blocker review procedure. You can look in the minutes or the log for the reasoning, but it generally came down to being unable to reproduce them. Of course, you still have the right to say "I told you so" if they blow up. I can't say for sure that nobody had an "agenda to ram it on through", but if they did, they didn't invite me to join the conspiracy. The discussion around the blockers and the release in general was reasoned and informed by folks arguing on both sides, as I would expect from the Fedora community. We can always stand to improve the process, and I'm happy to hear suggestions you have. But conspiratorial accusations are not constructive. -- Ben Cotton Fedora Program Manager TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
